<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Map Scale per zoom level&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=28" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/?p=28</link>
	<description>Stay tuned for random GIS banter are of Laudontech...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:49:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/?p=28#comment-219</guid>
		<description>@zroq: The difference in scale is not a bug. Google Maps uses a map projection similar to the Mercator projection. This means that the closer you get to the poles, the larger everything becomes. There&#039;s no helping it if you have to project a sphere onto a plane. To test this, simply zoom out a bit and drag north or south, and you will see the scale change dynamically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@zroq: The difference in scale is not a bug. Google Maps uses a map projection similar to the Mercator projection. This means that the closer you get to the poles, the larger everything becomes. There&#8217;s no helping it if you have to project a sphere onto a plane. To test this, simply zoom out a bit and drag north or south, and you will see the scale change dynamically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Corbett</title>
		<link>http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Corbett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 13:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/?p=28#comment-206</guid>
		<description>mapping to MapInfo&#039;s Zoom window width using stare and compare in the Louisville, Ky area:


multiply width by 2 on up
16 = 1.5 mi
17 = .75
divide width by 2 on down</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mapping to MapInfo&#8217;s Zoom window width using stare and compare in the Louisville, Ky area:</p>
<p>multiply width by 2 on up<br />
16 = 1.5 mi<br />
17 = .75<br />
divide width by 2 on down</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Krefft</title>
		<link>http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Krefft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/?p=28#comment-191</guid>
		<description>This is what i use:
1128.497176
2256.994353
4513.988705
9027.977411
18055.954822
36111.909643
72223.819286
144447.638572
288895.277144
577790.554289
1155581.108577
2311162.217155
4622324.434309
9244648.868618
18489297.737236
36978595.474472
73957190.948944
147914381.897889
295828763.795777
591657527.591555</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what i use:<br />
1128.497176<br />
2256.994353<br />
4513.988705<br />
9027.977411<br />
18055.954822<br />
36111.909643<br />
72223.819286<br />
144447.638572<br />
288895.277144<br />
577790.554289<br />
1155581.108577<br />
2311162.217155<br />
4622324.434309<br />
9244648.868618<br />
18489297.737236<br />
36978595.474472<br />
73957190.948944<br />
147914381.897889<br />
295828763.795777<br />
591657527.591555</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zroq</title>
		<link>http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>zroq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/?p=28#comment-188</guid>
		<description>you would never be able to compare two different cities in size , for example paris and nyc. because the scale is different for each area . it means that 2 miles looks different in paris than in nyc , this is a bug , hopefully google will discover this problem and fix it. try to put the scale at 2 miles in nyc and then for paris , you will see that you won&#039;t be able to get the same distance for 2 miles in each city , in paris for example 2 miles will show up as 2miles = 1 inch , but when you scroll to nyc  , yes that is a long scroll , the scale will suddenly change to 2 miles = 1,5 inch , and there is no way to escape this bug . too bad , now it is hard to put 2 cities next to eachother from different maps to see the size of a town compare to another city.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you would never be able to compare two different cities in size , for example paris and nyc. because the scale is different for each area . it means that 2 miles looks different in paris than in nyc , this is a bug , hopefully google will discover this problem and fix it. try to put the scale at 2 miles in nyc and then for paris , you will see that you won&#8217;t be able to get the same distance for 2 miles in each city , in paris for example 2 miles will show up as 2miles = 1 inch , but when you scroll to nyc  , yes that is a long scroll , the scale will suddenly change to 2 miles = 1,5 inch , and there is no way to escape this bug . too bad , now it is hard to put 2 cities next to eachother from different maps to see the size of a town compare to another city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tobias</title>
		<link>http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>tobias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 08:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/?p=28#comment-183</guid>
		<description>Take a look at the conversion table from ESRI:

http://blogs.esri.com/Support/blogs/mappingcenter/archive/2009/03/19/How-can-you-tell-what-map-scales-are-shown-for-online-maps_3F00_.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at the conversion table from ESRI:</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.esri.com/Support/blogs/mappingcenter/archive/2009/03/19/How-can-you-tell-what-map-scales-are-shown-for-online-maps_3F00_.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.esri.com/Support/blogs/mappingcenter/archive/2009/03/19/How-can-you-tell-what-map-scales-are-shown-for-online-maps_3F00_.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 02:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/?p=28#comment-179</guid>
		<description>As Morton pointed out, these numbers are pretty much useless.   What is needed is &quot;meters per pixel&quot; at every zoom level.   That&#039;s what the dynamic scale bar is showing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Morton pointed out, these numbers are pretty much useless.   What is needed is &#8220;meters per pixel&#8221; at every zoom level.   That&#8217;s what the dynamic scale bar is showing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geofumadas &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Maps, ahora con curvas de nivel</title>
		<link>http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>geofumadas &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Maps, ahora con curvas de nivel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 04:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/?p=28#comment-157</guid>
		<description>[...] de 2x a 17x, a la verdad eso no se puede asociar a una escala f&#225;cilmente, ya algunos han hecho sus aproximaciones, llegando a buenos niveles de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] de 2x a 17x, a la verdad eso no se puede asociar a una escala f&#225;cilmente, ya algunos han hecho sus aproximaciones, llegando a buenos niveles de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Maps, ahora con curvas de nivel</title>
		<link>http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Maps, ahora con curvas de nivel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 03:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/?p=28#comment-156</guid>
		<description>[...] de 2x a 17x, a la verdad eso no se puede asociar a una escala f&#225;cilmente, ya algunos han hecho sus aproximaciones, llegando a buenos niveles de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] de 2x a 17x, a la verdad eso no se puede asociar a una escala f&#225;cilmente, ya algunos han hecho sus aproximaciones, llegando a buenos niveles de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helsted</title>
		<link>http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Helsted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/?p=28#comment-152</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve made some calculations, and I do not reach the same scale values. 
I use the tilling scheme provided by google to calculate envelope&#039;s in each zoom level. 
(Remember that Google Maps use Mercator meters) 

Here are my results:

Zoom level 0      1:20088000.56607700 meters
Zoom level 1      1:10044000.28303850 meters   
Zoom level 2      1:5022000.14151925 meters   
Zoom level 3      1:2511000.07075963 meters
Zoom level 4      1:1255500.03537981 meters
Zoom level 5      1:627750.01768991 meters
Zoom level 6      1:313875.00884495 meters
Zoom level 7      1:156937.50442248 meters
Zoom level 8      1:78468.75221124 meters  
Zoom level 9      1:39234.37610562 meters
Zoom level 10     1:19617.18805281 meters  
Zoom level 11     1:9808.59402640 meters
Zoom level 12     1:4909.29701320 meters
Zoom level 13     1:2452.14850660 meters
Zoom level 14     1:1226.07425330 meters
Zoom level 15     1:613.03712665 meters
Zoom level 16     1:306.51856332 meters
Zoom level 17     1:153.25928166 meters   
Zoom level 18     1:76.62964083 meters
Zoom level 19     1:38.31482042 meters


PS. you don&#039;t have to know these scale values to create a tiling scheme for ArcGIS Server :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve made some calculations, and I do not reach the same scale values.<br />
I use the tilling scheme provided by google to calculate envelope&#8217;s in each zoom level.<br />
(Remember that Google Maps use Mercator meters) </p>
<p>Here are my results:</p>
<p>Zoom level 0      1:20088000.56607700 meters<br />
Zoom level 1      1:10044000.28303850 meters<br />
Zoom level 2      1:5022000.14151925 meters<br />
Zoom level 3      1:2511000.07075963 meters<br />
Zoom level 4      1:1255500.03537981 meters<br />
Zoom level 5      1:627750.01768991 meters<br />
Zoom level 6      1:313875.00884495 meters<br />
Zoom level 7      1:156937.50442248 meters<br />
Zoom level 8      1:78468.75221124 meters<br />
Zoom level 9      1:39234.37610562 meters<br />
Zoom level 10     1:19617.18805281 meters<br />
Zoom level 11     1:9808.59402640 meters<br />
Zoom level 12     1:4909.29701320 meters<br />
Zoom level 13     1:2452.14850660 meters<br />
Zoom level 14     1:1226.07425330 meters<br />
Zoom level 15     1:613.03712665 meters<br />
Zoom level 16     1:306.51856332 meters<br />
Zoom level 17     1:153.25928166 meters<br />
Zoom level 18     1:76.62964083 meters<br />
Zoom level 19     1:38.31482042 meters</p>
<p>PS. you don&#8217;t have to know these scale values to create a tiling scheme for ArcGIS Server <img src='http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laudontech.com/GISBlog/?p=28#comment-131</guid>
		<description>How about the width and height of the tiles per zoom level? And how do you determine the amount of rows and columns per zoom level? Anyone know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the width and height of the tiles per zoom level? And how do you determine the amount of rows and columns per zoom level? Anyone know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
